← Back to search

Transparent superconductivity in lithiated indium tin oxide thin films

Denisse Córdova Carrizales, Rain K. C. Wang, Johanna Nordlander, Grace A. Pan, Erika V. Ortega Ortiz, Larissa Little, Arthur McClelland, Ed Macomber, Austin J. Akey, Jarad A. Mason, Charles M. Brooks, Julia A. Mundy, Ari B. Turkiewicz

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.124803 · Physical Review Materials

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Indium tin oxide (Sn-doped In2O3; ITO) is a well-studied transparent conductor where doping can be used to stabilize a superconducting state. In this work, we use a combination of thin film deposition of ITO and solution-phase chemistry using n-BuLi (C4H9Li) to realize superconductivity in Li-doped ITO. Solution-phase intercalation is commonly employed for bulk, polycrystalline materials but has rarely been applied to thin films. Using x-ray diffraction, atomic force microscopy, electronic transport, and optical transmission measurements, we characterize the optical transparency and superconductivity of lithium intercalated ITO thin films. After 72 hours of lithium intercalation, we find a critical temperature, Tc, of 0.49 K and an optical transparency of at least 73% in the visible optical range—all while maintaining crystallinity and nanometer surface roughness.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
In

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.4Pressure not reportedunknown
Sn

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.7Pressure not reportedunknown
In2O3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.3Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers