Can the noble metals (Au, Ag, and Cu) be superconductors?
Giovanni Alberto Ummarino, Alessio Zaccone
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.L101801 · Physical Review Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
It is common knowledge that noble metals are excellent conductors but do not exhibit superconductivity. On the other hand, quantum confinement in thin films has been consistently shown to induce a significant enhancement of the superconducting critical temperature in several superconductors. It is, therefore, an important fundamental question whether ultrathin film confinement may induce observable superconductivity in nonsuperconducting metals. We present a generalization, in the Eliashberg framework, of a BCS theory of superconductivity in good metals under thinfilm confinement. By numerically solving these new Eliashberg-type equations, we find the dependence of the superconducting critical temperature on the film thickness L. This parameter-free theory predicts a maximum increase in the critical temperature for a specific value of the film thickness, which is a function of the number of free carriers in the material. Exploiting this fact, we predict that ultrathin films of gold, silver, and copper of suitable thickness could be superconductors at low but experimentally accessible temperatures. We demonstrate that this is a fine-tuning problem where the thickness must assume a very precise value, close to half a nanometer.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ag Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.294 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Au Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.042 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.118 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Quantum confinement theory of ultra-thin films: electronic, thermal and superconducting properties
similarity 0.93Alessio Zaccone · 2025 · arXiv:2505.08696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity at metal-antiferromagnetic insulator interfaces
similarity 0.91Eirik Løhaugen Fjærbu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherence effects in conventional layered superconductors
similarity 0.90S. P. Zhao
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Turning non-superconducting elements into superconductors by quantum confinement and proximity
similarity 0.89Giovanni A. Ummarino & Alessio Zaccone · 2026 · arXiv:2602.07585
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the Surface State of Noble Metal Gold and its Fermi Level Tuning by EuS Dielectric
similarity 0.88Peng Wei et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced superconductivity in CuH2 monolayers
similarity 0.88Xu Yan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified