Negative charge-transfer gap and even parity superconductivity in Sr2RuO4
Sumit Mazumdar
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023382 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A comprehensive theory of superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 must simultaneously explain experiments that suggest even-parity superconducting order and yet others that have suggested broken time-reversal symmetry. Completeness further requires that the theory is applicable to isoelectronic Ca2RuO4, a Mott-Hubbard semiconductor that exhibits an unprecedented insulator-to-metal transition which can be driven by very small electric field or current, and also by doping with very small concentration of electrons, leading to a metallic state proximate to ferromagnetism. A valence transition model, previously proposed for superconducting cuprates [Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205153 (2018)], is here extended to Sr2RuO4 and Ca2RuO4. The insulator-to-metal transition is distinct from that expected from the simple melting of the Mott-Hubbard semiconductor. Rather, the Ru ions occur as low spin Ru4+ in the semiconductor, and as high spin Ru3+ in the metal, the driving force behind the valence transition being the strong spin-charge coupling and consequent large ionization energy in the low charge state. Metallic and superconducting ruthenates are thus two-component systems in which the half-filled high spin Ru3+ ions determine the magnetic behavior but not transport, while the charge carriers are entirely on the layer oxygen ions, which have an average charge of −1.5. Spin-singlet superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 evolves from the correlated lattice-frustrated 34-filled band of layer oxygen ions alone, in agreement with quantum many-body calculations that have demonstrated enhancement by electron-electron interactions of superconducting pair-pair correlations uniquely at or very close to this filling [Gomes, Wasanthi De Silva, Dutta, Clay, and Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. B 93, 165110 (2016); Wasanthi De Silva, Gomes, Mazumdar, and Clay, Phys. Rev. B 93, 205111 (2016)]. Several model-specific experimental predictions are made, including that spin susceptibility due to Ru ions will remain unchanged as Sr2RuO4 is taken through superconducting Tc.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Model for Unconventional Superconductivity of Sr2RuO4: Effect of Impurity Scattering on Time-Reversal Breaking Triplet Pairing with a Tiny Gap
similarity 0.96K. Miyake & O. Narikiyo
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic Superconducting Gap in the Spin-Triplet Superconductor Sr2RuO4: Evidence from a Ru-NQR Study
similarity 0.96K. Ishida et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impurity bound states and symmetry of the superconducting order parameter in Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.96Kazumi Maki & Stephan Haas
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of a Large Superconductivity-Induced Gap in Magnetic Fluctuations of Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.96S. Kunkemöller et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 thin films under biaxial strain
similarity 0.95Yuan-Chun Liu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multicomponent order parameter superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 revealed by topological junctions
similarity 0.95M. S. Anwar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified