Spectroscopic signatures of gate-controlled superconducting phases
Maria Teresa Mercaldo, Francesco Giazotto, Mario Cuoco
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043042 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the tunneling conductance of superconductor-insulator–normal metal (SIN) and superconductor-insulator-superconductor (SIS) heterostructures with one superconducting side of the junction that is electrically driven and can exhibit π pairing through a modification of the surface inversion asymmetric couplings. In SIN tunneling we find that the variation of the electrically driven interactions generally brings an increase of quasiparticles in the gap due to orbitally polarized depaired states, irrespective of the interband phase rearrangement. The peak of SIN conductance at the gap edge varies with a trend that depends both on the strength of the surface interactions as well as on the character of the gate-induced superconducting state. While this shift can be also associated with thermal effects in the SIN configuration, for the SIS geometry at low temperature the electric field does not yield the characteristic matching peak at voltages related with the difference between the gaps of the superconducting electrodes. This observation sets out a distinctive mark for spectroscopically distinguishing thermal population effects from signatures that are mainly related to a variation of the electric field. In SIS the electrostatic gating yields a variety of features with asymmetric peaks and broadening of the conductance spectral weight. These findings indicate general qualitative trends for both SIN and SIS tunneling spectroscopy which could serve for evaluating the impact of electric field on superconductors and the occurrence of noncentrosymmetric orbital antiphase pairing.
Similar papers
Spectroscopic Signatures of Gate-Controlled Superconducting Phases
similarity 0.94Maria Teresa Mercaldo et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.01490
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of spin inelastic tunneling spectroscopy for superconductor-superconductor and superconductor-metal junctions
similarity 0.90P. Berggren & J. Fransson
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase relations in superconductor–normal metal–superconductor tunnel junctions
similarity 0.90Yu. S. Barash
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling spectroscopy for ferromagnet/superconductor junctions
similarity 0.89Igor Žutić & Oriol T. Valls
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of collective modes on pair tunneling into superconductors
similarity 0.89Yong Baek Kim & Xiao-Gang Wen
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport and magnetization dynamics in a superconductor/single-molecule magnet/superconductor junction
similarity 0.88S. Teber et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified