Insulator-to-metal crossover near the edge of the superconducting dome in Nd1−xSrxNiO2
Yu-Te Hsu, Bai Yang Wang, Maarten Berben, Danfeng Li, Kyuho Lee, Caitlin Duffy, Thom Ottenbros, Woo Jin Kim, Motoki Osada, Steffen Wiedmann, Harold Y. Hwang, Nigel E. Hussey
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042015 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report a systematic magnetotransport study of superconducting infinite-layer nickelate thin films Nd1−xSrxNiO2 with 0.15≤x≤0.225. By suppressing superconductivity with out-of-plane magnetic fields up to 37.5 T, we find that the normal state resistivity of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 is characterized by a crossover from a metallic T2 behavior to an insulating log(1/T) behavior for all x except x=0.225, at which the resistivity is predominantly metallic. The log(1/T) behavior is found to be robust against magnetic fields, inconsistent with scenarios involving localization or Kondo scattering, and points to an anomalous insulating state possibly driven by strong correlations. In the metallic state, we find no evidence for non-Fermi-liquid behavior arising from proximity to a putative quantum critical point located inside the superconducting dome.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nd1-xSrxNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pr2-xCexCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd2-xCexCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2-xLaxCuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconducting Dome in Nd1−xSrxNiO2 Infinite Layer Films
similarity 0.96Danfeng Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase Diagram and Superconducting Dome of Infinite-Layer Nd1−xSrxNiO2 Thin Films
similarity 0.95Shengwei Zeng et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intralayer-versus-interlayer pairing in the copper oxide superconductors
similarity 0.95R. A. Klemm & S. H. Liu
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of electron-phonon interaction and electron correlation in high-temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.95Sumio Ishihara & Naoto Nagaosa
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of strong magnetic fields on pairing fluctuations in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.95M. Eschrig et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Correlated electrons in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.95Elbio Dagotto
Source status unknown — claims are unverified