Andreev bound states in junctions formed by conventional and PT-symmetric non-Hermitian superconductors
Viktoriia Kornich, Björn Trauzettel
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033201 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study theoretically a junction composed of a PT-symmetric non-Hermitian superconductor (PTS) placed between two conventional superconductors. We show that due to non-Hermitian electron-electron interaction in the PTS region and the combination of symmetries, only discrete values of phases of the conventional superconductors yield solutions for Andreev bound states. Remarkably, in the case of phases 0 and π, we obtain Andreev bound states that are growing and decaying in time. For π/2 and 3π/2, there is a Majorana zero mode penetrating through the junction in only one direction forming a quasiparticle supercurrent.
Similar papers
Andreev bound states in junctions formed by conventional and -symmetric non-Hermitian superconductors
similarity 0.99Viktoriia Kornich & Björn Trauzettel · 2022 · arXiv:2205.07785
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonequilibrium Andreev bound states population in short superconducting junctions coupled to a resonator
similarity 0.91Raffael L. Klees et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev bound states and supercurrent in disordered spin-orbit-coupled nanowire superconductor-normal-superconductor junctions
similarity 0.91Jonas Lidal & Jeroen Danon
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev levels spectroscopy of topological three-terminal junctions
similarity 0.90Stefano Valentini et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supersymmetric Hamiltonian solutions simulated by Andreev bound states
similarity 0.90Artem V. Galaktionov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle poisoning in trivial and topological Josephson junctions
similarity 0.90Aleksandr E. Svetogorov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified