← Back to search

Doping dependence of scattering rate for linear-in-temperature resistivity in cuprate superconductors

Mingyang Qin, Ruozhou Zhang, Chaoran Miao, Zhongxu Wei, Yujun Shi, Yixuan Yao, Haowen Wang, Yangmu Li, Kui Jin, Xiaodong Xiang

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023194 · Physical Review Research

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The origin of the linear-in-temperature (T-linear) resistivity in cuprate superconductors remains a profound mystery in condensed matter physics. Here, we investigate the dependence of the T-linear resistivity coefficient on doping, i.e., A1(p), for three typical regions in the temperature versus doping phase diagram of hole-doped cuprates, from which the doping dependence of the scattering rate, i.e., α1(p), is further derived. It is found that for region I (p<p* and T>T*), α1(p) is almost a constant; for region II (p>p* and T>Tcoh), α1(p)∝p; for region III (p>p* and T<Tcoh), α1(p)∝p(pc−p), where T* is the onset temperature of the pseudogap phase, p* indicates the doping at which T* goes to zero, Tcoh marks the onset of antinodal quasiparticle coherence, and pc is the doping where the low-temperature linear behavior in the overdoped regime vanishes. Moreover, the deduced α1(p) relations are verified with the experimental data from previous reports. The discovered scattering rate versus doping relationship will shed light on the scattering mechanism underlying the T-linear resistivity in cuprate superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
HgBa2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
La2-xCexCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers