Tunneling spectroscopy in superconducting circuit lattices
Botao Du, Qihao Guo, Santiago López, Ruichao Ma
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L022038 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We demonstrate tunneling spectroscopy of synthetic quantum matter in superconducting circuit lattices. We measure site-resolved excitation spectra by coupling the lattice to engineered driven-dissipative particle baths that serve as local tunneling probes. Using incoherent particle source and drain, we independently extract quasiparticle and quasihole spectra and reconstruct the spatial structure of collective excitations. We perform spectroscopy of a strongly interacting Bose-Hubbard lattice to measure changes in energy spectra for superfluid and Mott-insulator states at different densities and observe the effects of three-body interactions. Our results provide a toolset for characterizing many-body states in analog quantum simulators.
Similar papers
Probing Site-Resolved Current in Strongly Interacting Superconducting Circuit Lattices
similarity 0.95Botao Du et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting circuit probe for analog quantum simulators
similarity 0.92Liang-Hui Du et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Measurement of many-body quantum correlations in superconducting circuits
similarity 0.91Kamal Sharma & Wade DeGottardi
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hybrid quantum magnetism in circuit-QED: from spin-photon waves to many-body spectroscopy
similarity 0.91Andreas Kurcz et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1310.8173
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle effects in quantum-induced transitions in superconductors
similarity 0.91Jungzae Choi & Jorge V. José
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superradiance with an ensemble of superconducting flux qubits
similarity 0.90Neill Lambert et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified