New method to improve the accuracy of quench position measurement on a superconducting cavity by a second sound method
ZhenChao Liu, Michael Kelly, Alireza Nassiri
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.15.092001 · Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quench is a common phenomenon in a superconducting cavity and often limits the accelerating gradient of the cavity. Accurate location of the quench site, typically located at a material or geometrical defect, is the key to improve the cavity accelerating gradient. Here, the second sound propagation in liquid helium II is used to detect the quench location on the cavity. The technique is relatively convenient and complements the traditional temperature mapping which measures the “prequench” temperature rise on the cavity using an array of sensors. The speed of the second sound in liquid helium II is roughly 1.7 cm/ms at 2 K which is sufficiently fast to provide a millimeter-size position resolution. However, the dynamics of the quench at the cavity surface are also found to significantly affect the achievable resolution with real cavities. Here we use a dynamic quench model, based on ANSYS, to calculate the quench area and the temperature distribution on the cavity. The detection error caused by the thermal conduction in the niobium was calculated.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Characterization of a superconducting Pb photocathode in a superconducting rf photoinjector cavity
similarity 0.93R. Barday et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Search for Superscreening Effects in a Superconductor
similarity 0.93P. Ujić et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor-semiconductor interaction effects in mesoscopic hybrid structures
similarity 0.93F. Rahman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity-induced superconducting transition temperature
similarity 0.93Mary Eileen Farrell & Marilyn F. Bishop
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of spin fluctuations on superconductivity in V and Nb: A first-principles study
similarity 0.93Kentaro Tsutsumi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic barriers for digital superconducting electronics: A review
similarity 0.92A. Mitrovic & M. Bocko
Source status unknown — claims are unverified