Magnetic property of a staggered-array undulator using a bulk high-temperature superconductor
Ryota Kinjo, Kenta Mishima, Yong-Woon Choi, Mohamed Omer, Kyohei Yoshida, Hani Negm, Konstantin Torgasin, Marie Shibata, Kyohei Shimahashi, Hidekazu Imon, Kensuke Okumura, Motoharu Inukai, Heishun Zen, Toshiteru Kii, Kai Masuda, Kazunobu Nagasaki, Hideaki Ohgaki
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.022401 · Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The magnetic field of a staggered-array undulator using a bulk high-temperature superconductor is calculated by analytical and numerical methods. Analytical formulas for the undulator field and the solenoid field required to generate the undulator field are derived from a simple two-dimensional model. The analytical calculation shows the degree of dependence of these fields on the undulator parameters, the generation of a high undulator field proportional to the critical current density of the bulk superconductor, and the good tunability of the undulator field over a wide range of values. The numerical calculation is performed in a three-dimensional geometry by two methods: the center field and energy minimization methods. The latter treats the current distribution inside the bulk, whereas the former neglects it as a natural extension of the analytical model. The calculation also reveals the dependence of the fields on the undulator parameters arising from the current distribution. From the comparison with experimental results, we find that the latter method reproduces the experimental results well, which indicates the importance of the current distribution inside the bulk. Therefore, we derive a semiempirical formula for the required solenoid field by modifying the analytical formula using the numerical results so as to include the effect of the current distribution. The semiempirical formula reproduces the numerical result with an error of 3%. Finally, we estimate the magnetic performance of the undulator as an example of using the formulas and values presented in this paper. The estimation shows that an undulator field twice as large as that of the present in-vacuum undulator but with an equal period and gap can be obtained at a temperature of approximately 20–40 K, and that deflection parameters (K values) of 1 and 2 can be achieved with periods of 5 and 10 mm at approximately 4–20 K.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| GdBCO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 94 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pulse magnetized superconducting bulk array undulator concept
similarity 0.91Dian Weerakonda et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Linear Low Temperature Spin Susceptibility in the Underdoped High Tc Superconductor, Gd:YBa2Cu4O8
similarity 0.89A. Jánossy et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Inverse analysis of critical current density in a bulk high-temperature superconducting undulator
similarity 0.89Ryota Kinjo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical and thermodynamic properties of the high-temperature superconductor HgBa2CuO4+δ
similarity 0.89E. van Heumen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin susceptibility in the superconducting state of the ferromagnetic superconductor UCoGe
similarity 0.87T. Hattori et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic and superconducting properties of RBa2Cu3Ox compounds
similarity 0.87S. E. Brown et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified