Erasure Qubits: Overcoming the T1 Limit in Superconducting Circuits
Aleksander Kubica, Arbel Haim, Yotam Vaknin, Harry Levine, Fernando Brandão, Alex Retzker
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041022 · Physical Review X
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The amplitude-damping time T1 has long stood as the major factor limiting quantum fidelity in superconducting circuits, prompting concerted efforts in the material science and design of qubits aimed at increasing T1. In contrast, the dephasing time Tϕ can usually be extended above T1 (via, e.g., dynamical decoupling) to the point where it does not limit fidelity. In this article, we propose a scheme for overcoming the conventional T1 limit on fidelity by designing qubits in a way that amplitude-damping errors can be detected and converted into erasure errors. Compared to standard qubit implementations, our scheme improves the performance of fault-tolerant protocols, as numerically demonstrated by the circuit-noise simulations of the surface code. We describe two simple qubit implementations with superconducting circuits and discuss procedures for detecting amplitude-damping errors, performing entangling gates, and extending Tϕ. Our results suggest that engineering efforts should focus on improving Tϕ and the quality of quantum coherent control, as they effectively become the limiting factor on the performance of fault-tolerant protocols.
Similar papers
Implementation of the three-qubit phase-flip error correction code with superconducting qubits
similarity 0.88L. Tornberg et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0803.1747
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fault-Tolerant Computing With Biased-Noise Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.88Panos Aliferis et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.0383
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppressing relaxation in superconducting qubits by quasiparticle pumping
similarity 0.86Simon Gustavsson et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1612.08462
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optimal control for fast and high-fidelity quantum gates in coupled superconducting flux qubits
similarity 0.85Shang-Yu Huang & Hsi-Sheng Goan · 2014 · arXiv:1406.7707
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Longitudinal and Nonlinear Coupling for High-Fidelity Readout of a Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.85Can Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time-optimal performance of Josephson charge qubits: A process tomography approach
similarity 0.85Robert Roloff & Walter Pötz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified