Persistent Control of a Superconducting Qubit by Stroboscopic Measurement Feedback
P. Campagne-Ibarcq, E. Flurin, N. Roch, D. Darson, P. Morfin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, F. Mallet, B. Huard
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.3.021008 · Physical Review X
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Making a system state follow a prescribed trajectory despite fluctuations and errors commonly consists of monitoring an observable (temperature, blood-glucose level, etc.) and reacting on its controllers (heater power, insulin amount, etc.). In the quantum domain, there is a change of paradigm in feedback, since measurements modify the state of the system, most dramatically when the trajectory goes through superpositions of measurement eigenstates. Here, we demonstrate the stabilization of an arbitrary trajectory of a superconducting qubit by measurement-based feedback. The protocol benefits from the long coherence time (T2>10 μs) of the 3D transmon qubit, the high efficiency (82%) of the phase-preserving Josephson amplifier, and fast electronics that ensure less than 500 ns total delay. At discrete time intervals, the state of the qubit is measured and corrected in case an error is detected. For Rabi oscillations, where the discrete measurements occur when the qubit is supposed to be in the measurement pointer states, we demonstrate an average fidelity of 85% to the targeted trajectory. For Ramsey oscillations, which do not go through pointer states, the average fidelity reaches 76%. Incidentally, we demonstrate a fast reset protocol that allows us to cool a 3D transmon qubit down to 0.6% in the excited state.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Digital Coherent Control of a Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.97E. Leonard, Jr. et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Initialization by Measurement of a Superconducting Quantum Bit Circuit
similarity 0.96D. Ristè et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Digital Control of a Superconducting Qubit Using a Josephson Pulse Generator at 3 K
similarity 0.96L. Howe et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Parametric Control of a Superconducting Flux Qubit
similarity 0.96S. Saito et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gated Conditional Displacement Readout of Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.96S. Touzard et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Adaptive quantum tomography in an indistinct measurement system with superconducting circuits
similarity 0.96Hyeok Hwang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified