Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why?
Andrey V. Chubukov, M. Khodas, Rafael M. Fernandes
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041045 · Physical Review X
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Magnetism and nematic order are the two nonsuperconducting orders observed in iron-based superconductors. To elucidate the interplay between them and ultimately unveil the pairing mechanism, several models have been investigated. In models with quenched orbital degrees of freedom, magnetic fluctuations promote stripe magnetism, which induces orbital order. In models with quenched spin degrees of freedom, charge fluctuations promote spontaneous orbital order, which induces stripe magnetism. Here, we develop an unbiased approach, in which we treat magnetic and orbital fluctuations on equal footing. Key to our approach is the inclusion of the orbital character of the low-energy electronic states into renormalization group (RG) analysis. We analyze the RG flow of the couplings and argue that the same magnetic fluctuations, which are known to promote s+− superconductivity, also promote an attraction in the orbital channel, even if the bare orbital interaction is repulsive. We next analyze the RG flow of the susceptibilities and show that, if all Fermi pockets are small, the system first develops a spontaneous orbital order, then s+− superconductivity, and magnetic order does not develop down to T=0. We argue that this scenario applies to FeSe. In systems with larger pockets, such as BaFe2As2 and LaFeAsO, we find that the leading instability is either towards a spin-density wave or superconductivity. We argue that in this situation nematic order is caused by composite spin fluctuations and is vestigial to stripe magnetism. Our results provide a unifying description of different iron-based materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaFeAsO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Interplay between Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Orbital Order in 5-Pocket Model for Iron-Based Superconductors: Parquet Renormalization Group Study
similarity 0.96Laura Classen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of magnetic excitations in iron-based layered superconductors
similarity 0.95M. M. Korshunov & I. Eremin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of magnetic and structural transitions in iron-based pnictide superconductors
similarity 0.95A. Cano et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of disorder on the superconducting transition temperature near a Lifshitz transition
similarity 0.95Thaís V. Trevisan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dichotomy between Large Local and Small Ordered Magnetic Moments in Iron-Based Superconductors
similarity 0.95P. Hansmann et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
In-plane electronic anisotropy resulted from ordered magnetic moment in iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.95S.-F. Wu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified