Hybridization at Superconductor-Semiconductor Interfaces
August E. G. Mikkelsen, Panagiotis Kotetes, Peter Krogstrup, Karsten Flensberg
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031040 · Physical Review X
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Hybrid superconductor-semiconductor devices are currently one of the most promising platforms for realizing Majorana zero modes. Their topological properties are controlled by the band alignment of the two materials, as well as the electrostatic environment, which are currently not well understood. Here, we seek to fill in this gap and address the role of band bending and superconductor-semiconductor hybridization in such devices by analyzing a gated single Al-InAs interface using a self-consistent Schrödinger-Poisson approach. Our numerical analysis shows that the band bending leads to an interface quantum well, which localizes the charge in the system near the superconductor-semiconductor interface. We investigate the hybrid band structure and analyze its response to varying the gate voltage and thickness of the Al layer. This is done by studying the hybridization degrees of the individual subbands, which determine the induced pairing and effective g factors. The numerical results are backed by approximate analytical expressions which further clarify key aspects of the band structure. We find that one can obtain states with strong superconductor-semiconductor hybridization at the Fermi energy, but this requires a fine balance of parameters, with the most important constraint being on the width of the Al layer. In fact, in the regime of interest, we find an almost periodic dependence of the hybridization degree on the Al width, with a period roughly equal to the thickness of an Al monolayer. This implies that disorder and shape irregularities, present in realistic devices, may play an important role for averaging out this sensitivity and, thus, may be necessary for stabilizing the topological phase.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Dynamical parity selection in superconducting weak links
similarity 0.92Nico Ackermann et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-Coherence Hybrid Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.92Matthias Steffen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductors as spin sources for spintronics
similarity 0.92F. Giazotto & F. Taddei
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of hyperbolic plasmons and superconductivity
similarity 0.92Andrey Grankin & Victor Galitski
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coupling a Superconducting Quantum Circuit to a Phononic Crystal Defect Cavity
similarity 0.92Patricio Arrangoiz-Arriola et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current Rectification in Junctions with Spin-Split Superconductors
similarity 0.92Stefan Ilić et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified