Revisiting vestigial order in nematic superconductors: Gauge-field mechanisms and model constraints
I. Maccari, E. Babaev, J. Carlström
DOI 10.1103/gccc-rfw4 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
An electronic nematic order that originates from superconducting fluctuation but persists above the superconducting transition temperature is often referred to as a vestigial nematic phase. Such a vestigial order belongs to the broader class of composite orders discussed in earlier literature, characterized by ordering in gauge-invariant combinations of superconducting order parameters while the individual superconducting order parameters remain disordered. These states include metallic superfluids, paired phases, and composite (charge-4e) superconductors. Whether and under what conditions such a vestigial phase can emerge in realistic models of nematic superconductors remains an open question. Recent analytical work [P. T. How and S. K. Yip, Phys. Rev. B 107, 104514 (2023)] concluded that vestigial nematic phases—and related mechanisms—do not appear in the widely studied models proposed for, e.g., Bi2Se3-based candidates. To shed light on this question, we perform large-scale Monte Carlo simulations of a three-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau model of a nematic superconductor. Consistent with the findings of How and Yip, our numerical results confirm that commonly considered models do not exhibit vestigial nematic phases or nematic-fluctuation-induced charge-4e superconductivity. Extending the analysis to include coupling to a gauge field, we show that vestigial nematic order can, under restrictive conditions, be stabilized through an alternative mechanism: intercomponent coupling mediated by the gauge field or the effects of strong correlations.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| BaxFe1-xFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Se3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Thermoelectric signature of the nematic phase in hole-doped iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.95Marcin Matusiak & Michał Babij
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modulation of pairing symmetry with bond disorder in unconventional superconductors
similarity 0.95Yao-Tai Kang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex chains due to nonpairwise interactions and field-induced phase transitions between states with different broken symmetry in superconductors with competing order parameters
similarity 0.95Julien Garaud & Egor Babaev
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of Superconductivity by Twin Boundaries in FeSe
similarity 0.95Can-Li Song et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ginzburg-Landau approach to the vortex–domain wall interaction in superconductors with nematic order
similarity 0.95R. S. Severino et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-doping evolution of the low-energy spin excitations in the iron arsenide superconductor BaFe2−xNixAs2
similarity 0.95Miaoyin Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified