Interfering trajectories in a ballistic Andreev cavity
Pankaj Mandal, Marcel Kaschper, Fernando Dominguez, Soumi Mondal, Lukas Lunczer, Dongyun Chen, Martin P. Stehno, Ewelina M. Hankiewicz, Björn Trauzettel, Teun M. Klapwijk, Charles Gould, Laurens W. Molenkamp
DOI 10.1103/hls3-jqzj · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The conventional description of transport through the interface between a normal conductor and a superconductor reduces the system to a one-dimensional problem treating Andreev reflection based on a zero-dimensional Sharvin-type point-contact model, and effectively neglects all considerations of device geometry. While this has been successful in systems where conductance in the normal material is in the diffusive transport regime, such an oversimplification of the problem fails in other transport regimes. In particular, when transport is ballistic as in a typical semiconductor-superconductor hybrid structure, geometrical effects are inherently important, and a proper description must consider a one-dimensional contact injecting into a two-dimensional ballistic cavity. We present a study of this regime and explore the bias-voltage dependence of Andreev transport in a cavity-type device comprised of a high-mobility HgTe quantum well side-contacted by one superconducting and one normal contact, each creating a one-dimensional interface. The enhanced conductance from Andreev transport features two finite-bias conductance peaks, observed at energies within the energy gap of the superconductor. Interestingly, these two peaks respond differently to the application of a perpendicular-to-plane magnetic field. Using a semiclassical model for the quantum transport within the cavity, we are able to attribute each peak to a different class of ballistic trajectories. One class is dominated by normal reflection, and its interference condition is independent of magnetic field, whereas the other one contains retroreflected Andreev processes at the superconductor interface. These create closed trajectories that are strongly suppressed by magnetic field due to Aharonov-Bohm and Doppler shift effects.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoRe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Quantized conductance with nonzero shot noise as a signature of Andreev edge state
similarity 0.93Manas Ranjan Sahu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonballistic transport characteristics of superconducting point contacts
similarity 0.92Ritesh Kumar & Goutam Sheet
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
First-principles study of metal-graphene edge contact for ballistic Josephson junction
similarity 0.90Yeonghun Lee et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev Reflection in Strong Magnetic Fields
similarity 0.90H. Hoppe et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Barrier-induced enhancement of Andreev reflection for minority-spin quasiparticles in ferromagnetic metal/insulator/superconductor ballistic junctions
similarity 0.90A. Dimoulas
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev spectroscopy of doped HgTe quantum wells
similarity 0.90M. Guigou & J. Cayssol
Source status unknown — claims are unverified