Raman response in superconducting multiorbital systems with application to nickelates
Matías Bejas, Jun Zhan, Xianxin Wu, Andreas P. Schnyder, Andrés Greco
DOI 10.1103/mvc9-3dhq · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The recent discovery of high-Tc superconductivity in pressurized and thin film nickelates is nowadays one of the most relevant and active topics in solid-state physics. The origin of superconductivity together with the relevance of multiorbital physics are highly discussed issues in this field. Knowledge of the size of the gap and its symmetry is of fundamental interest to uncover the superconducting mechanism at play in the nickelates. Electronic Raman scattering is a powerful tool to investigate the main characteristics of the gap. Here, we investigate the Raman response in the superconducting phase for three different models: Two-orbital models, including dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals, with one and two layers; as well as a bilayer model with the dx2−y2 orbital as the only active one. For each of these models, we consider different pairing symmetries and determine their characteristic fingerprints in the Raman response. For the two-orbital models, we perform full multiorbital calculations including interorbital and intraorbital scattering, and compare the results with those obtained using the additive Raman response where each band is considered separately. Our results should be useful for discussing the minimal model for superconductivity and its pairing symmetry in nickelates. The obtained results and discussions, as well as the presented formalism, are also of general interest for other multiorbital systems.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La3Ni2O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 80 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3Ni2O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
Similar papers
Orbital order and superconductivity in bilayer nickelate compounds
similarity 0.96Giniyat Khaliullin & Jiří Chaloupka
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional pressure-dependent interorbital and interlayer doping in superconducting nickelates
similarity 0.95Y. N. Huang & David J. Singh
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of magnetic excitations in the multilayer nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7
similarity 0.95Steffen Bötzel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
t−J model for strongly correlated two-orbital systems: Application to bilayer nickelate superconductors
similarity 0.95Tatsuya Kaneko et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure, self-doping, and superconducting instability in the alternating single-layer trilayer stacking nickelates La3Ni2O7
similarity 0.94Yang Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge and spin instabilities in superconducting La3Ni2O7
similarity 0.94Xuejiao Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified