Tuning superconductivity and charge density wave order by next-nearest-neighbor hopping integral in honeycomb Holstein model
Hongxing Liu, Lufeng Zhang, Tianxing Ma
DOI 10.1103/nsr6-w9kj · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
By using unbiased determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations, we investigate the interplay between superconductivity and charge density wave order in the Holstein model on a honeycomb lattice with next-nearest-neighbor hopping t′. We find that a finite negative t′ enhances s-wave superconducting pairing susceptibility near the van Hove fillings in the weak electron-phonon coupling regime, while it suppresses superconductivity and promotes charge density wave order at intermediate electron-phonon coupling strengths. The effect of t′ on a charge density wave is filling dependent: it suppresses the charge density wave at half filling but enhances it near the van Hove singularities. A Spectral analysis reveals the opening of a gap at low temperatures, highlighting the competitive relationship between superconducting and charge density wave orders mediated by electron-phonon coupling and tuned by t′.
Similar papers
Tuning superconductivity and charge density wave order by next-nearest-neighbor hopping integral in honeycomb Holstein model
similarity 0.93Hongxing Liu et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.16260
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition among Superconducting, Antiferromagnetic, and Charge Orders with Intervention by Phase Separation in the 2D Holstein-Hubbard Model
similarity 0.92Takahiro Ohgoe & Masatoshi Imada
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robustness of bipolaronic superconductivity to electron-density–phonon coupling
similarity 0.90Chao Zhang
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and Charge Density Wave in the Holstein Model on the Penrose Lattice
similarity 0.89Lu Liu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified