Complete Self-Testing of a System of Remote Superconducting Qubits
Simon Storz, Anatoly Kulikov, Josua D. Schär, Victor Barizien, Xavier Valcarce, Florence Berterottière, Nicolas Sangouard, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Andreas Wallraff
DOI 10.1103/nv7d-k3wr · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Self-testing protocols enable the certification of quantum systems in a device-independent manner, i.e., without knowledge of the inner workings of the quantum devices under test. Here, we demonstrate this high standard for characterization routines with superconducting circuits, a prime platform for building large-scale quantum computing systems. We first develop the missing theory allowing for the self-testing of Pauli measurements. We then self-test Bell pair generation and measurements at the same time, performing a complete self-test in a system composed of two entangled superconducting circuits operated at a separation of 30 m. In an experiment based on 17 million trials, we measure an average CHSH (Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt) S value of 2.236. Without relying on additional assumptions on the experimental setup, we certify an average Bell state fidelity of at least 58.9% and an average measurement fidelity of at least 89.5% in a device-independent manner, both with 99% confidence. This enables applications in the field of distributed quantum computing and communication with superconducting circuits, such as delegated quantum computing.
Similar papers
Realization of High-Fidelity Perfect Entanglers between Remote Superconducting Quantum Processors
similarity 0.89Juan Song et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing Many-Body Bell Correlation Depth with Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.88Ke Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robust Concurrent Remote Entanglement Between Two Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.87A. Narla et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stabilizing a Bell state of two superconducting qubits by dissipation engineering
similarity 0.86Z. Leghtas et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Deterministic Bidirectional Communication and Remote Entanglement Generation Between Superconducting Quantum Processors
similarity 0.86N. Leung et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.02028
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Error-Detected State Transfer and Entanglement in a Superconducting Quantum Network
similarity 0.86Luke D. Burkhart et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified