Enhanced Tc in transition-metal-embedded B2C2 and B2P2 monolayers: A route to tunable two-dimensional superconductors via atomic and stacking design
Zheng-Wei Liu, Shan-Shan Wu, Chuan-Lu Yang, Xiaohu Li, Yuliang Liu, Wenkai Zhao, Feng Gao
DOI 10.1103/nx9x-nqyj · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The superconducting behavior of transition-metal-embedded hexagonal boron-carbon (B2C2) and boron-phosphorus (B2P2) monolayers is systematically explored in both face-to-back (FB) and face-to-face (FF) stacking configurations. Embedding 3d and 4d transition metals into B2C2 and B2P2 frameworks induces robust metallicity, enabling superconductivity in these two-dimensional systems. Structural, dynamic, and energy stability are confirmed via formation energy analysis, phonon dispersion calculations, and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, revealing several dynamically stable and nonmagnetic metallic phases: six MBC (M=Sc, V, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo), seven FF−MB2C2, five FB−MB2P2, and eight FF−MB2P2 structures. By combining electron–phonon coupling analysis with the McMillan-Allen-Dynes formula and anisotropic Migdal–Eliashberg equations, we predict superconducting transition temperatures (Tc) of up to 71.0 K for FF−CuB2C2—featuring a distinct two-gap signature—and 31.5 K for MoBC with a single-gap profile, attributed to σ-bonding states and van Hove singularities, respectively. In comparison, B2P2-based systems show lower Tc values up to 27.1 K (e.g., FF−ZrB2P2), attributed to weaker bonding interactions. A comprehensive comparison of atomic composition (C vs P) and stacking geometry highlights the critical role of covalency and electronic topology in governing superconducting properties, offering valuable guidance for the design of high−Tc two-dimensional superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| ScBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| VBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| ZrBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 31.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CuB2C2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 71 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| ScB2P2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| VB2P2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| ZrB2P2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CrB2C2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SrB2C2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 64 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Thickness-dependent oscillation of the superconducting Tc in ultrathin NbC films: A first-principles study
similarity 0.94Chang-Jiang Wu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting-critical-temperature oscillations in Nb/CuMn multilayers
similarity 0.93L. V. Mercaldo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-band superconductivity of bulk and surface states in Ag thin films on Nb
similarity 0.93Tihomir Tomanic et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional superconducting phase in the weakly correlated noncentrosymmetric Mo3Al2C compound
similarity 0.93E. Bauer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of magnetic order on proximity-induced superconductivity in Mn layers on Nb(110) from first principles
similarity 0.93Sohair ElMeligy et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-temperature multigap superconductivity in two-dimensional metal borides
similarity 0.93Cem Sevik et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified