← Back to search

Competing pair density wave and uniform d-wave superconductivity in phase-separated 214 cuprates at the 1/8 anomaly

Q. Chen, A. Moskal, Y. Wang, B. D. E. McNiven, A. A. Aczel, W. Tian, B. D. Gaulin

DOI 10.1103/sdfz-j5vz · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Compelling evidence exists for electronic phase separation in cuprate high-Tc superconductors, emerging near 1/8 hole doping. At these dopings and low temperatures, intertwined charge and spin stripes coexist with more uniformly doped regions in the two-dimensional (2D) copper-oxide planes. Each region is capable of developing superconducting pairing, either as a pair density wave (PDW) within the stripes or as a uniform d-wave condensate (d-SC) in the more homogeneous regions. Using neutron scattering on single crystals of La1.875−yNdySr0.125CuO4, we demonstrate that the onset temperatures for spin stripe order (TN) and superconductivity (Tc) merge as the average ordered moment vanishes in LSCO (y=0), whereas Nd doping stabilizes static stripe order and suppresses Tc. Because the spin stripes possess the same in-plane periodicity (8a) as the PDW and establish the framework within which the PDW resides, the stabilization of spin stripe order enhances PDW correlations. Thus, the competition between d-wave pairing in the uniform regions and PDW pairing in the stripe-ordered regions can be controlled by the Nd concentration in La1.875−yNdySr0.125CuO4, allowing the superconducting Tc to vary by nearly an order of magnitude at a fixed 1/8-hole doping.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La2-xBaxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

40Pressure not reportedonset
La2-xBaxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
La1.875-yNdySr0.125CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.6Pressure not reportedonset
La1.875-yNdySr0.125CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.5Pressure not reportedmidpoint
La1.875-yNdySr0.125CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

13Pressure not reportedonset
La1.875-yNdySr0.125CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5Pressure not reportedmidpoint
La1.875-yNdySr0.125CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

35Pressure not reportedonset
La1.875-yNdySr0.125CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25Pressure not reportedmidpoint
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

37Pressure not reportedonset
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

28Pressure not reportedmidpoint

Similar papers