Anisotropic superconductivity in the two-dimensional metal-organic kagome framework Cu3(CO)6
Jing-Jing Zheng, Jingyu Li, Rong-Rong Ma, Fengkai Guo, Jiang-Jiang Ma, Peng-Fei Liu
DOI 10.1103/srwj-fttf · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Motivated by the theoretical prediction of superconductivity in the Cu3(CS)6 monolayer and the successful experimental realization of its analogous oxygen counterpart Cu3(CO)6 monolayer [X. Zhang et al., Nano Lett. 17, 6166 (2017); R. Zhang et al., Angew. Chem. 132, 2691 (2020); N. Shaiek et al., Adv. Mater. Interfaces 9, 2201099 (2022)], we present a comprehensive theoretical investigation of phonons and the electron-phonon coupling mechanism in the Cu3(CO)6 monolayer. Our first-principles calculations reveal that this well-defined two-dimensional metal-organic framework (2D-MOF) is a superconductor with a critical temperature of 16.5 K. This robust superconductivity is driven by a strong electron-phonon coupling (λ=0.72), predominantly contributed by the strong interaction between low-energy phonons (dominated by Cu and O atoms) and electronic states (formed by Cu dxy,x2−y2 and O s+px,y orbitals) near the Fermi level. Furthermore, we find that Cu3(CO)6 monolayer exhibits a Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer superconducting state characterized by a single anisotropic gap. Our findings in 2D-MOFs highlight the great potential for exploring superconductivity in this promising class of materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu3(CO)6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu3(CS)6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.43 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu3(CS)6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.25 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| LiC12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 41 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 100 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Doping-induced antiferromagnetic bicollinear insulating state and superconducting temperature of monolayer FeSe systems
similarity 0.92Michael C. Lucking et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distinct Electronic Origins of Superconductivity and Nematicity in FeSe
similarity 0.92Xueying Ma et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multifaceted impact of a surface step on superconductivity in atomically thin films
similarity 0.92L.-F. Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and nematic fluctuations in a model of doped FeSe monolayers: Determinant quantum Monte Carlo study
similarity 0.92Philipp T. Dumitrescu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-Temperature Superconductivity in Single-Unit-Cell FeSe Films on Anatase TiO2(001)
similarity 0.91Hao Ding et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting transition temperature: Interacting Fermi gas and phonon mechanisms in the nonadiabatic regime
similarity 0.91Lev P. Gor'kov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified