Superconducting-qubit gates robust to parameter fluctuations
E.M. Wright, L. Van Damme, N.J. Glaser, A. Devra, F.A. Roy, J. Englhardt, N. Bruckmoser, L. Koch, A. Marx, J. Schirk, C.M.F. Schneider, L. Södergren, I. Tsitsilin, F. Wallner, S.J. Glaser, M. Werninghaus, S. Filipp
DOI 10.1103/tf39-n6s3 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
State-of-the-art single-qubit gates on superconducting transmon qubits can achieve the fidelities required for error-corrected computations; however, parameter fluctuations due to qubit instabilities, environmental changes, and control inaccuracies make it difficult to maintain this performance. To mitigate the effects of these parameter variations, we numerically derive gates that are robust to amplitude and frequency errors using gradient-ascent pulse engineering. We analyze how fluctuations in qubit frequency, drive amplitude, and coherence affect gate performance over time. The robust pulses suppress coherent errors from drive-amplitude drifts over 15 times more than a Gaussian pulse with derivative removal by adiabatic gate (DRAG) corrections. Furthermore, the robust gates, originally designed to compensate for quasistatic errors, also demonstrate resilience to stochastic, time-dependent noise, which is reflected in the dephasing time. They suppress added errors during increases in dephasing by up to 1.7 times more than DRAG.
Similar papers
Robust, fast, and high-fidelity composite single-qubit gates for superconducting transmon qubits
similarity 0.92Hristo G. Tonchev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal Quantum Gate Set Approaching Fault-Tolerant Thresholds with Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.90Jerry M. Chow et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robustness of quantum gates with hybrid spin-photon qubits in superconducting resonators
similarity 0.88A. Chiesa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gate-error analysis in simulations of quantum computers with transmon qubits
similarity 0.87D. Willsch et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exploiting Dynamic Quantum Circuits in a Quantum Algorithm with Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.87A. D. Córcoles et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Perturbative analysis of quasiperiodic patterning of transmon quantum computers: Enhancement of many-body localization
similarity 0.86Evangelos Varvelis & David P. DiVincenzo
Source status unknown — claims are unverified