Eliashberg theory prediction of critical currents in superconducting thin films under DC electric fields
Giovanni Alberto Ummarino, Alessio Zaccone, Alessandro Braggio, Francesco Giazotto
DOI 10.1103/ykpr-l7t5 · Physical Review Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting thin metallic films, functioning as supercurrent gate-tunable transistors, have considerable potential for future quantum electronic devices. Despite extensive research, a comprehensive microscopic quantitative mechanism that elucidates the control or suppression of supercurrents in thin films remains elusive. Focusing on NbN, a prototypical material, and starting from a phenomenological ansatz that links the critical electric field with the kinetic energy parameter needed to break Cooper pairs, we provide a quantitative analysis of the critical current using Eliashberg theory in the dirty limit without adjustable parameters. The critical kinetic energy value is identified, corresponding to the maximum supercurrent that can flow in the thin film. The peak in supercurrent density as a function of the Cooper pairs' kinetic energy arises from the interplay between the increase in supercurrent due to increased kinetic energy and the depairing effect when the kinetic energy becomes sufficiently large. The critical value of the pair's kinetic energy is subsequently employed to estimate the critical value of an external electric field required to suppress superconductivity in the sample. This estimation is in parameter-free agreement with the experimental observations. Although the disorder reduces the temperature dependence of the gating effect on the critical current, at the same time, it increases the unscreened critical electric field needed to suppress superconductivity. This enables the proposal of methods to control and reduce the critical field value necessary to suppress superconductivity in superconducting electronics.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Oscillatory regimes of the thermomagnetic instability in superconducting films
similarity 0.92J. I. Vestgården et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal phase slips in superconducting films
similarity 0.91Mikhail A. Skvortsov & Artem V. Polkin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport properties of semiconductor-superconductor junctions in quantizing magnetic fields
similarity 0.91Y. Takagaki
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Large-N transition temperature for superconducting films in a magnetic field
similarity 0.91L. M. Abreu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid Density and Phase Relaxation in Superconductors with Strong Disorder
similarity 0.91G. Seibold et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex-induced dissipation in narrow current-biased thin-film superconducting strips
similarity 0.91L. N. Bulaevskii et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified