Anisotropic scattering rates in strain-tuned Sr2RuO4
Ben Currie, David T. S. Perkins, Evgeny Kozik, Joseph J. Betouras, Jörg Schmalian
DOI 10.1103/zjhr-xw73 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Motivated by recent angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) experiments, we analyze the temperature, frequency, and momentum dependence of the single-particle scattering rate in a model of the γ-band of Sr2RuO4 under strain, with particular emphasis on the behavior near the Lifshitz transition where the Fermi energy crosses a single Van Hove point. While the scattering rate is only moderately anisotropic at zero strain, we find that it becomes strongly anisotropic at the Lifshitz point. At the lowest energies, we recover the expected universal behavior: the scattering rate varies (ignoring logarithmic corrections) as τ−1∼ω at the Van Hove point and as τ−1∼ω3/2 away from it. At higher energies, however, corrections of order ω2 become important in both regimes. We show that the experimentally observed behavior τ−1∼ωα with α≈1.4(2) at the Van Hove point can be quantitatively explained by a superposition of linear and quadratic contributions to the scattering rate, which are comparable in magnitude at the intermediate energies probed by experiment, rather than in terms of a new universal power law. We further predict a distinctive anisotropy, strain dependence, and a nonmonotonic frequency dependence of the scattering rate at a Lifshitz transition, all of which may be directly tested in experiments.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
High-Energy Anomaly in the Band Dispersion of the Ruthenate Superconductor
similarity 0.93H. Iwasawa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Extended Van Hove Singularity in a Noncuprate Layered Superconductor Sr2RuO4”
similarity 0.90A. P. Mackenzie et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic scattering rates in strain-tuned SrRuO
similarity 0.90Ben Currie et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.09024
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Kerr Effect from Diffractive Skew Scattering in Chiral px±ipy Superconductors
similarity 0.89Elio J. König & Alex Levchenko
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topology of Andreev bound states with flat dispersion
similarity 0.89Masatoshi Sato et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting order parameter of Sr2RuO4: A microscopic perspective
similarity 0.88Aline Ramires & Manfred Sigrist
Source status unknown — claims are unverified