Comparison of coherence times in three dc SQUID phase qubits
Hanhee Paik, B. K. Cooper, S. K. Dutta, R. M. Lewis, R. C. Ramos, T. A. Palomaki, A. J. Przybysz, A. J. Dragt, J. R. Anderson, C. J. Lobb, F. C. Wellstood
arXiv:0705.4509 · DOI 10.1109/TASC.2007.898124 · 2007-05-31
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report measurements of spectroscopic linewidth and Rabi oscillations in three thin-film dc SQUID phase qubits. One device had a single-turn Al loop, the second had a 6-turn Nb loop, and the third was a first order gradiometer formed from 6-turn wound and counter-wound Nb coils to provide isolation from spatially uniform flux noise. In the 6 - 7.2 GHz range, the spectroscopic coherence times for the gradiometer varied from 4 ns to 8 ns, about the same as for the other devices (4 to 10 ns). The time constant for decay of Rabi oscillations was significantly longer in the single-turn Al device (20 to 30 ns) than either of the Nb devices (10 to 15 ns). These results imply that spatially uniform flux noise is not the main source of decoherence or inhomogenous broadening in these devices.
Similar papers
Superconducting quantum interference devices with submicron Nb/HfTi/Nb junctions for investigation of small magnetic particles
similarity 0.89J. Nagel et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1106.1985
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive measurements of superconducting qubit coherence with a fast, latching readout
similarity 0.89I. Siddiqi et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0507548
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A tunable rf SQUID manipulated as flux and phase qubit
similarity 0.89S Poletto et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0910.4562
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence in dc SQUID phase qubits
similarity 0.88Hanhee Paik et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0804.4430
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of large and oscillations in a proximity dc superconducting quantum interference device
similarity 0.88Jian Wei et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0803.3104
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mach-Zehnder Interferometry in a Strongly Driven Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.88William D. Oliver et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0512691
Source status unknown — claims are unverified