A Little About Folklore
E. G. Maksimov, O. V. Dolgov
arXiv:0707.2489 · 2007-07-17 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Comment on paper by P.W. Anderson is presented. This Anderson's work is shown to contain a number of inaccurate and ungrounded statements. We point out, in particular, that the total static dielectric function not only can be negative, but inevitably has a minus sign in many stable systems. We also demonstrate that in many metals, the effective electron-phonon interaction is stronger than the direct Coulomb repulsion, without taking into account the ladder-sum renormalization or pseudization of the Coulomb repulsion. Other issues touched in Anderson's paper are also discussed.
Similar papers
Dielectric response of Anderson and pseudogapped insulators
similarity 0.77M. V. Feigel'man et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1711.05972
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Is room-temperature superconductivity with phonons possible?
similarity 0.76M. de Llano & M. Grether · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0601526
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Philip Warren Anderson
similarity 0.76Premala Chandra et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2510.20865
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low-energy dynamical response of an Anderson insulator with local attraction
similarity 0.75Ivanov, D. A. & Feigel'man, M. V. · 2017 · arXiv:1609.05304
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phil Anderson's Magnetic Ideas in Science
similarity 0.75Piers Coleman · 2016 · arXiv:1605.06993
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Diffusive Conductors as Andreev Interferometers
similarity 0.75Yuli V. Nazarov & T. H. Stoof
Source status unknown — claims are unverified