Flux line lattice state versus magnetism in electron-doped cuprate superconductor Sr_{1-x}La_{x}CuO_{2}
Kohki H. Satoh, Soshi Takeshita, Akihiro Koda, Ryosuke Kadono, Kenji Ishida, Sunsen Pyon, Takao Sasagawa, Hidenori Takagi
arXiv:0710.0773 · 2007-10-03
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The microscopic details of flux line lattice state studied by muon spin rotation is reported in an electron-doped high-$T_{\rm c}$ cuprate superconductor, Sr$_{1-x}$La$_{x}$CuO$_{2}$ (SLCO, $x=0.10$--0.15). A clear sign of phase separation between magnetic and non-magnetic phases is observed, where the effective magnetic penetration depth [$λ\equivλ(T,H)$] is determined selectively for the latter phase. The extremely small value of $λ(0,0)$ %versus $T_{\rm c}$ and corresponding large superfluid density ($n_s \propto λ^{-2}$) is consistent with presence of a large Fermi surface with carrier density of $1+x$, which suggests the breakdown of the "doped Mott insulator" even at the "optimal doping" in SLCO. Moreover, a relatively weak anisotropy in the superconducting order parameter is suggested by the field dependence of $λ(0,H)$. These observations strongly suggest that the superconductivity in SLCO is of a different class from hole-doped cuprates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr1-xLaxCuO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 42 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Sr0.9La0.1CuO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Fermi-liquid behavior and weakly anisotropic superconductivity in the electron-doped cuprate Sr1−xLaxCuO2
similarity 0.97Kohki H. Satoh et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase-sensitive evidence for dx2−y2-pairing symmetry in the parent-structure high-Tc cuprate superconductor Sr1−xLaxCuO2
similarity 0.92Jochen Tomaschko et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field-induced transition between magnetically disordered and ordered phases in underdoped La(2-x)SrxCuO4
similarity 0.90B. Khaykovich et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411355
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase-sensitive evidence for dx2-y2-pairing symmetry in the parent-structure high-Tc cuprate superconductor Sr1-xLaxCuO2
similarity 0.90J. Tomaschko et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1203.5237
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dichotomy in the -linear resistivity in hole-doped cuprates
similarity 0.89N. E. Hussey et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.2001
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition between charge/spin-density-wave orders and superconductivity in LaBaSrCuO
similarity 0.89M. Fujita et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0107355
Source status unknown — claims are unverified