Electronic Correlations within Fermionic Lattice Models
M. Matlak, B. Grabiec, S. Krawiec
arXiv:0711.0624 · DOI 10.12693/APHYSPOLA.112.537 · 2007-11-05 · arXiv: Strongly Correlated Electrons
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate two-site electronic correlations within generalized Hubbard model, which incorporates the conventional Hubbard model (parameters: $t$ (hopping between nearest neighbours), $U$ (Coulomb repulsion (attraction)) supplemented by the intersite Coulomb interactions (parameters: $J^{(1)}$(parallel spins), $J^{(2)}$ (antiparellel spins)) and the hopping of the intrasite Cooper pairs (parameter: $V$). As a first step we find the eigenvalues $E_α $ and eigenvectors $|E_α>$ of the dimer and we represent each partial Hamiltonian $E_α |E_α > < E_α |$ ($α=1,2,..,16$) in the second quantization with the use of the Hubbard and spin operators. Each dimer energy level possesses its own Hamiltonian describing different two-site interactions which can be active only in the case when the level will be occupied by the electrons. A typical feature is the appearence of two generalized $t-J$ interactions ascribed to two different energy levels which do not vanish even for $% U=J^{(1)}=J^{(2)}=V=0$ and their coupling constants are equal to $\pm t$ in this case. The competition between ferromagnetism, antiferromagnetism and superconductivity (intrasite and intersite pairings) is also a typical feature of the model because it persists in the case $U=J^{(1)}=J^{(2)}=V=0$ and $t\neq 0$. The same types of the electronic, competitive interactions are scattered between different energy levels and therefore their thermodynamical activities are dependent on the occupation of these levels. It qualitatively explains the origin of the phase diagram of the model. We consider also a real lattice as a set of interacting dimers to show that the competition between magnetism and superconductivity seems to be universal for fermonic lattice models.
Similar papers
Pairing in Asymmetrical Fermi Systems with Intra- and Inter-Species Correlations
similarity 0.90Renyuan Liao & Khandker F. Quader · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0611421
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double fluctuations on the attractive Hubbard model: ladder approximation
similarity 0.90S. Schafroth & J. J. Rodriguez · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9701017
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of superconductivity and magnetism in strong coupling
similarity 0.90C. N. A. van Duin & J. Zaanen · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9908228
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Odd-frequency Cooper pairs in two-band superconductors and their magnetic response
similarity 0.89Yasuhiro Asano & Akihiro Sasaki · 2015 · arXiv:1510.07345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetism and superconductivity within extended Hubbard model for a dimer. Exact results
similarity 0.89Grabiec, B. et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0511329
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak-Coupling Instabilities of Two-Dimensional Lattice Electrons
similarity 0.89B. Binz · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0207067
Source status unknown — claims are unverified