Grand canonical Gutzwiller approximation for magnetic inhomogeneous systems
Noboru Fukushima
arXiv:0801.2280 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.115105 · 2008-01-15 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Gutzwiller approximation (GA) for Gutzwiller-projected grand canonical wave functions with fugacity factors is investigated in detail. Our systems in general contain inhomogeneity and local magnetic moments. In deriving renormalization formulae, we also derive or estimate terms of higher powers of intersite contractions neglected in the conventional GA. We examine several different constraints, i.e., local/global spin-dependent/independent particle-number conservation. Out of the four, the local spin-dependent constraint seems the most promising at present. An improved GA derived from it agrees with the variational Monte Carlo method better than the conventional GA does. The corrections to the conventional GA can be interpreted as two-site correlation including the phase difference of configurations. Furthermore, projected quasi-particle excited states are orthogonal to each other within the GA. Using these states, spectral weights are calculated. We show that asymmetry between electron addition and removal spectra can appear by taking into account the higher powers of the intersite contractions in the case of the d-wave superconductors and the Fermi sea; the addition is smaller than the removal. However, the asymmetry is quite weak especially near the Fermi level. In contrast, projected s-wave superconductors can have the opposite asymmetry (addition larger than removal) especially near the Fermi level. In addition, formulae from the other three constraints are also derived, which may be useful depending on purposes.
Similar papers
Time-dependent Gutzwiller simulation of Floquet topological superconductivity
similarity 0.89Takahiro Anan et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.06069
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the evaluation of matrix elements in partially projected wave functions
similarity 0.88N. Fukushima et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0503143
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Particle number renormalization in almost half filled Mott Hubbard superconductors
similarity 0.88Bernhard Edegger et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0506120
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Theoretical Analysis of Superconducting Pairing in Correlated Metallic Systems
similarity 0.87Koushik Mandal & Ranjan Chaudhury · 2021 · arXiv:2111.10888
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gutzwiller Method for an Extended Periodic Anderson Model with the c-f Coulomb Interaction
similarity 0.87Katsunori Kubo · 2011 · arXiv:1108.3132
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of spin-triplet superconductivity with magnetism within a single mechanism for orbitally degenerate correlated electrons: Statistically-consistent Gutzwiller approximation
similarity 0.87M Zegrodnik et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.4478
Source status unknown — claims are unverified