Phases in optical lattices vs. Coulomb frustrated HTc cuprates

Henning Heiselberg

← Back to search

Phases in optical lattices vs. Coulomb frustrated HTc cuprates

Henning Heiselberg

arXiv:0802.0127 · 2008-02-01 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T3

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Fermionic atoms in 2D optical lattices and electrons in HTc cuprates may both be described by the Hubbard model. However, if Coulomb frustration is responsible for the striped phases in 2D cuprates the phase diagrams will differ markedly. Two representative scenarios are described by a simple stripe model without phase separation and a mean field model with phase separation in the absence of Coulomb frustration. When Coulomb frustrated both models display antiferromagnetism (AF) and stripe phases with d-wave superfluidity, whereas neutral atoms in optical lattices will only do so in the stripe model. Radii and densities of the various phases in harmonically confined optical lattices are calculated for the two models and have very different Mott plateaus and density discontinuities. We discuss observation of antiferromagnetic, stripe and superfluid phases in density and momentum distributions and correlations from time-of-flight experiments.