Doping dependence of the upper critical field in La_{2-x}Sr_xCuO_4 from specific heat
Yue Wang, Hai-Hu Wen
arXiv:0803.0638 · DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/81/57007 · 2008-03-05 · EPL (Europhysics Letters)
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The low-temperature specific heat of La_{2-x}Sr_xCuO_4 (LSCO) single crystals in magnetic field H up to 12 T has been examined over a wide range of doping (0.063=< p =<0.238). From this we have mapped the upper critical field H_{c2} of LSCO across the entire superconducting diagram. It is found that the H_{c2} shows a doping dependence similar to that of the critical temperature T_c. We have discussed the implications of the result and proposed that there may be an effective superconducting energy scale responsible for the H_{c2} behavior in the underdoped region.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.937Sr0.063CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.937Sr0.063CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.931Sr0.069CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.931Sr0.069CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.925Sr0.075CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15.7 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.925Sr0.075CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.91Sr0.09CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24.6 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.91Sr0.09CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.89Sr0.11CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 29.3 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.89Sr0.11CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 36.1 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.822Sr0.178CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 36 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.822Sr0.178CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.81Sr0.19CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.81Sr0.19CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.798Sr0.202CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.798Sr0.202CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.782Sr0.218CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.782Sr0.218CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.78Sr0.22CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27.4 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.78Sr0.22CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.762Sr0.238CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 20 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.762Sr0.238CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Electronic Structure of La2-xSrxCuO4 in the Vicinity of the Superconductor-Insulator Transition
similarity 0.92A. Ino et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9902048
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of Two Components in Magnetic Excitations of LaSrCuO ( = 0.10 and 0.16)
similarity 0.91Kentaro Sato et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2005.11025
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting anisotropy in the electron-doped high-T superconductors PrCeCuO
similarity 0.91Guoqing Wu et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.5467
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependent evolution of the electronic structure of La2-xSrxCuO4 in the superconducting and metallic phases
similarity 0.91A. Ino et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0005370
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dichotomy in the -linear resistivity in hole-doped cuprates
similarity 0.91N. E. Hussey et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.2001
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak coupling d-wave BCS superconductivity and unpaired electrons in overdoped La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_{4} single crystals
similarity 0.90Y. Wang et al. · 2007 · arXiv:cond-mat/0703463
Source status unknown — claims are unverified