d-wave superconductivity in Hubbard model on the square lattice perturbed by weak 3D uniaxial anisotropy
J. M. P. Carmelo
arXiv:0804.2388 · 2008-04-15 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Hubbard model on a square lattice is one of the most studied condensed-matter quantum problems.Here we find evidence that for intermediate $U/4t$ values and a hole-concentration range $x\in (x_c,x_*)$ the ground state of the Hubbard model on the square lattice perturbed by weak three-dimensional (3D) uniaxial anisotropy has long-range d-wave superconducting order. Here $t$ is the effective nearest-neighbor transfer integral and $U$ the effective on-site repulsion. The lower critical concentration $x_c$ involves the Ginzburg number Gi and is approximately given by $x_c\approx {\rm Gi}+x_0\approx 0.05$. Here $x_0<{\rm Gi}$ is a small critical hole concentration that marks a sharp quantum phase transition from a Mott-Hubbard insulator with long-range antiferromagnetic order for $x<x_0$ to an Anderson insulator with short-range incommensurate spiral spin order for $x\in (x_0,x_c)$. The value of the critical hole concentration $x_*$ depends on $U/4t$ and is given by $x_*\approx 0.27$ for $U/4t\approx 1.525$. The long-range d-wave superconducting order emerges below a critical temperature $T_c$ for a hole concentration range centered at $x_{op}= (x_c+x_*)/2\approx 0.16$. It results from the effects of the residual interactions of the charge $c$ and spin-neutral two-spinon $s1$ fermions of Ref. \cite{companion2}, as a by-product of the short-range spin correlations. The spin subsystem provides through such interactions the energy needed for the effective pairing coupling between the $c$ fermions of the virtual-electron pair configurations.
Similar papers
Competition between d-wave superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in the two-dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.90M. Capone & G. Kotliar
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Computing Effective Hamiltonians of Doped and Frustrated Antiferromagnets By Contractor Renormalization
similarity 0.89Assa Auerbach · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0510738
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Inhomogeneous Hubbard Models
similarity 0.89Wei-Feng Tsai & Steven A. Kivelson · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0601113
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and superconducting order parameter phase fluctuations in a weakly doped antiferromagnet
similarity 0.89V. M. Loktev & V. M. Turkowski · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610849
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spatially Modulated Electronic Nematicity in the Three-Band Model of Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.89S. Bulut et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.3301
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Diagnosing Topological Phase Transitions in 1D Superconductors using Berry Singularity Markers
similarity 0.89Panagiotis Kotetes · 2021 · arXiv:2112.03320
Source status unknown — claims are unverified