← Back to search

X-ray spectra and electronic structure of FeAs superconductors

E. Z. Kurmaev, R. G. Wilks, A. Moewes, N. A. Skorikov, Yu. A. Izyumov, L. D. Finkelstein, R. H. Li, X. H. Chen

arXiv:0805.0668 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.220503 · 2008-05-06 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical33 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The densities of the valence and conduction band electronic states of the newly discovered layered superconductors LaOFeAs, LaO$_{0.87}$F$_{0.13}$FeAs (Tc=26 K), SmO$_{0.95}$F$_{0.05}$FeAs and SmO$_{0.85}$F$_{0.15}$FeAs (Tc=43 K) are studied using soft X-ray absorption and emission spectroscopy combined with FP LAPW calculations of LaOFeAs, LaO$_{0.875}$FeAs and LaO$_{0.875}$F${0.125}$FeAs. The Fe 3d-states are localized in energy near the top of the valence band and are partially hybridized with p-type O (2p), As (4p), and La (6p) states approximately 3 eV below the Fermi energy. The Fe L3 X-ray emission spectra do not show any features that would indicate the presence of the low Hubbard 3d-band or the quasiparticle peak that were predicted by the DMFT analysis of LaOFeAs. We can conclude that the LaOFeAs-type compounds do not represent strongly correlated systems. When either oxygen vacancies or fluorine dopants are included in numerical electronic structure calculations the width of O 2p-band decreases, but the distribution of Fe 3d-states is largely unaffected.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
LaO0.87F0.13FeAs

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

26Pressure not reportedunknown
SmO0.85F0.15FeAs

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

43Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers