Amplitude Spectroscopy of a Solid-State Artificial Atom
David M. Berns, Mark S. Rudner, Sergio O. Valenzuela, Karl K. Berggren, William D. Oliver, Leonid S. Levitov, Terry P. Orlando
arXiv:0805.1552 · DOI 10.1038/nature07262 · 2008-05-11 · Nature
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The energy-level structure of a quantum system plays a fundamental role in determining its behavior and manifests itself in a discrete absorption and emission spectrum. Conventionally, spectra are probed via frequency spectroscopy whereby the frequency νof a harmonic driving field is varied to fulfill the conditions ΔE = h ν, where the driving field is resonant with the level separation ΔE (h is Planck's constant). Although this technique has been successfully employed in a variety of physical systems, including natural and artificial atoms and molecules, its application is not universally straightforward, and becomes extremely challenging for frequencies in the range of 10's and 100's of gigahertz. Here we demonstrate an alternative approach, whereby a harmonic driving field sweeps the atom through its energy-level avoided crossings at a fixed frequency, surmounting many of the limitations of the conventional approach. Spectroscopic information is obtained from the amplitude dependence of the system response. The resulting ``spectroscopy diamonds'' contain interference patterns and population inversion that serve as a fingerprint of the atom's spectrum. By analyzing these features, we determine the energy spectrum of a manifold of states with energies from 0.01 to 120 GHz \times h in a superconducting artificial atom, using a driving frequency near 0.1 GHz. This approach provides a means to manipulate and characterize systems over a broad bandwidth, using only a single driving frequency that may be orders of magnitude smaller than the energy scales being probed.
Similar papers
Large-amplitude driving of a superconducting artificial atom: Interferometry, cooling, and amplitude spectroscopy
similarity 0.90William D. Oliver & Sergio O. Valenzuela · 2009 · arXiv:0906.0185
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Landau-Zener-Stückelberg Spectroscopy of a Superconducting Flux Qubit
similarity 0.89Shuang Xu et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1009.4295
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nondestructive readout for a superconducting flux qubit
similarity 0.89A. Lupascu et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0311510
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-Shot Readout of Macroscopic Quantum Superposition State in a Superconducting Flux Qubit
similarity 0.88Hirotaka Tanaka et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407299
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A theoretical analysis of flux-qubit measurements with a dc-SQUID
similarity 0.88H. Nakano et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0406622
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase-Coherent Dynamics of a Superconducting Flux Qubit with Capacitive-Bias Readout
similarity 0.88F. Deppe et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0710.4455
Source status unknown — claims are unverified