← Back to search

Magnetic anisotropy in ferromagnetic Josephson junctions

M. Weides

arXiv:0805.3925 · DOI 10.1063/1.2967873 · 2008-05-26 · Applied Physics Letters

T318 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Magnetotransport measurements were done on $\Nb/\Al_2Ø_3/\Cu/\Ni/\Nb$ superconductor-insulator-ferromagnet-superconductor Josephson tunnel junctions. Depending on ferromagnetic $\Ni$ interlayer thickness and geometry the standard (1d) magnetic field dependence of critical current deviates from the text-book model for Josephson junctions. The results are qualitatively explained by a short Josephson junction model based on anisotropy and 2d remanent magnetization.

Similar papers

Magnetic interference patterns in 0−π superconductor/insulator/ferromagnet/superconductor Josephson junctions: Effects of asymmetry between 0 and π regions

similarity 0.90

M. Kemmler et al.

Source status unknown — claims are unverified

Josephson effect in thin-film superconductor/insulator/superconductor junctions with misaligned in-plane magnetic fields

similarity 0.89

J. Linder & A. Sudbø · 2007 · arXiv:0707.4413

Source status unknown — claims are unverified

FMR induced Josephson Current in a Superconductor/Ferromagnet/Superconductor Junction

similarity 0.89

S. Hikino et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0802.1755

Source status unknown — claims are unverified

Josephson effect due to the long-range odd-frequency triplet superconductivity in SFS junctions with Neel domain walls

similarity 0.89

Ya. V. Fominov et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610440

Source status unknown — claims are unverified

Thickness Dependence of the Josephson Ground States of Superconductor-Ferromagnet-Superconductor Junctions

similarity 0.89

V. A. Oboznov et al.

Source status unknown — claims are unverified

Ferromagnetic 0-pi Josephson junctions

similarity 0.88

M. Weides et al. · 2007 · arXiv:cond-mat/0701693

Source status unknown — claims are unverified