Variational approach to vortex penetration and vortex interaction
Alexander D. Hernández, Arturo López
arXiv:0806.1217 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.144506 · 2008-06-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A variational calculation for vortex penetration is presented. Variational trial functions for the Meissner state are combined with variational functions for a vortex near the surface. The latter is based on Clem's trial solutions for a vortex in bulk, which were adapted to include surface effects through consideration of an image vortex. Three variational parameters are considered, corresponding to the effective coherence length of the vortex, the effective penetration length for the Meissner currents, and the value of the order parameter at the surface. The results show that the last two variational parameters are independent of vortex position. Explicit calculations are presented for several $κ$ values. The energy barrier for vortex penetration is shown to be in good agreement with full numerical calculations of the Ginzburg--Landau equations. We consider the variation of the magnetic flux carried by a vortex as it gets inside the superconductor and agreement with known experimental and theoretical results is obtained. The model was extended to calculate the force between two vortices, and the results show that the force goes to zero as the pair comes close to the surface. This result can be of interest for the study of the melting of the vortex lattice and for vortices confined in mesoscopic superconductors. The variational approach can be very helpful for intermediate $κ$ values when numerical calculations become computationally demanding because it provides manageable expressions for all physically relevant quantities.
Similar papers
The Meissner effect and the vortex structure in stacked junctions and layered superconductors: Exact analytical results
similarity 0.90Sergey V. Kuplevakhsky · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0202293
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Creation and pinning of vortex-antivortex pairs
similarity 0.90Sangbum Kim et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610306
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the Nature of the Phase Transition Triggered by Vortex-Like Deffects in the 2D Ginzburg-Landau Model
similarity 0.89G. Alvarez & H. Fort · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0010137
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time-Dependent Ginzburg-Landau Simulations of Superconducting Vortices in Three Dimensions
similarity 0.89Antonio Lara et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2001.07971
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gradient Flow in the Ginzburg-Landau Model of Superconductivity
similarity 0.89P. Mikula et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1511.03714
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear Meissner States, Vortex Sheets, and Laminar Structures in Extreme Type-II Superconductors
similarity 0.88Eugene B. Kolomeisky · 2026 · arXiv:2607.29608
Source status unknown — claims are unverified