Parametrized canonical transformation for the Hubbard-model at arbitrary interaction strength
Balazs Hetenyi, Hans Gerd Evertz
arXiv:0806.3848 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.033110 · 2008-06-24 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The $t-J$ and Heisenberg models are truncated expansions of a canonically transformed Hubbard model coinciding with it at $U\to \infty$. We show that a modified canonical transformation applied to the Hubbard model leads to alternative models of the same form, but whose convergence properties with respect to the expansion are more favourable, resulting in a good description of the half-filled ground state even at $0<U\leq1$. We investigate the transformed Hamiltonian and observables for metallic and insulating variational wave-functions.
Similar papers
Extracting quantum-geometric effects from Ginzburg-Landau theory in a multiband Hubbard model
similarity 0.89M. Iskin · 2023 · arXiv:2304.03613
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Symmetries and Mean-Field Phases of the Extended Hubbard Model
similarity 0.89A. B. Eriksson et al. · 1994 · arXiv:cond-mat/9411071
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mixed temperature-dependent order parameters in the extended Hubbard model
similarity 0.88Joel Hutchinson & Frank Marsiglio · 2019 · arXiv:1902.08316
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic Hubbard Model: Effect of Finite Boson Frequency
similarity 0.88F. Marsiglio et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0307594
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The degenerate 3-band Hubbard model with "anti-Hund's rule" interactions; a model for AxC60
similarity 0.88M. Granath & S. Ostlund · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0309032
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gutzwiller-RVB Theory of High Temperature Superconductivity: Results from Renormalised Mean Field Theory and Variational Monte Carlo Calculations
similarity 0.88B. Edegger et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0707.1020
Source status unknown — claims are unverified