Effect of strong correlations on the high energy anomaly in hole- and electron-doped high-Tc superconductors
B. Moritz, F. Schmitt, W. Meevasana, S. Johnston, E. M. Motoyama, M. Greven, D. H. Lu, C. Kim, R. T. Scalettar, Z. -X. Shen, T. P. Devereaux
arXiv:0807.3359 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/11/9/093020 · 2008-07-21 · New Journal of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently, angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) has been used to highlight an anomalously large band renormalization at high binding energies in cuprate superconductors: the high energy 'waterfall' or high energy anomaly (HEA). This paper demonstrates, using a combination of new ARPES measurements and quantum Monte Carlo simulations, that the HEA is not simply the by-product of matrix element effects, but rather represents a cross-over from a quasiparticle band at low binding energies near the Fermi level to valence bands at higher binding energy, assumed to be of strong oxygen character, in both hole- and electron-doped cuprates. While photoemission matrix elements clearly play a role in changing the aesthetic appearance of the band dispersion, i.e. the 'waterfall'-like behavior, they provide an inadequate description for the physics that underlies the strong band renormalization giving rise to the HEA. Model calculations of the single-band Hubbard Hamiltonian showcase the role played by correlations in the formation of the HEA and uncover significant differences in the HEA energy scale for hole- and electron-doped cuprates. In addition, this approach properly captures the transfer of spectral weight accompanying both hole and electron doping in a correlated material and provides a unifying description of the HEA across both sides of the cuprate phase diagram.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nd1.83Ce0.17CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CuO6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Understanding electron-doped cuprate superconductors as hole superconductors
similarity 0.90J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2019 · arXiv:1904.09164
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tendencies of enhanced electronic nematicity in the Hubbard model and a comparison with Raman scattering on high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.89Tianyi Liu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.07486
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Tc Superconductivity: Doping Dependent Theory Confirmed by Experiment
similarity 0.89Stephen B. Haley & Herman J. Fink · 2011 · arXiv:1108.0731
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing symmetries in the Zeeman-coupled extended attractive Hubbard model
similarity 0.89Swagatam Nayak et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.06352
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strongly Correlated Impurity Band Superconductivity in Diamond: X-ray Spectroscopic evidence for upper Hubbard and mid-gap bands
similarity 0.88G. Baskaran · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0410296
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The high-energy anomaly in ARPES spectra of the cuprates-many body or matrix element effect?
similarity 0.88E. D. L. Rienks et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1312.5143
Source status unknown — claims are unverified