Superconductivity in the 2D Hubbard model: Electron doping is different
D. Eichenberger, D. Baeriswyl
arXiv:0808.0433 · 2008-08-04 · arXiv: Strongly Correlated Electrons
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A variational Monte Carlo calculation is used for studying the ground state of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, including hopping between both nearest and next-nearest neighbor sites. Superconductivity with d-wave symmetry is found to be restricted to densities where the Fermi surface crosses the magnetic zone boundary. The condensate energy is much larger for hole doping than for electron doping. Superconductivity is kinetic energy driven for hole doping, but potential energy driven for electron doping. Our findings agree surprisingly well with experimental data for layered cuprates, both for electron- and hole-doped materials.
Similar papers
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model?
similarity 0.93D. Baeriswyl et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0612690
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in the two-dimensional Hubbard model: a variational study
similarity 0.90D. Eichenberger & D. Baeriswyl · 2007 · arXiv:0708.2795
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model: Gutzwiller wave function solution
similarity 0.90Jan Kaczmarczyk et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Variational ground states of the two-dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.90D. Baeriswyl et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0907.1593
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependence of spin excitations in the stripe phase of high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.90G. Seibold & J. Lorenzana · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0509175
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting ground state of the two-dimensional Hubbard model: a variational study
similarity 0.90David Eichenberger & Dionys Baeriswyl · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0608210
Source status unknown — claims are unverified