Topological character of hydrodynamic screening in suspensions of hard spheres: an example of universal phenomenon
Ethan E. Ballard, Arkady L. Kholodenko
arXiv:0808.2189 · DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2009.04.010 · 2008-08-15
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Although in the case of polymer solutions the existence of hydrodynamic screening is considered as established, use of the same methods for suspensions of hard spheres so far have failed to produce similar results. In this work we reconsider this problem. Using superposition of topological, combinatorial and London-style qualitative arguments, we prove the existence of screening in suspensions. We show that the nature of hydrodynamic screening in suspensions is analogous to that known for the Meissner effect in superconductors. The extent of screening depends on volume fraction of hard spheres. The zero volume fraction limit corresponds to the normal state. The case of finite volume fractions-to the mixed state typical for superconductors of the second kind. Such a state is becoming fully "superconducting" at some critical volume fraction for which the (zero frequency) relative viscosity diverges. Our analytical results describing this divergence are in accord with known scaling results obtained by Brady and Bicerano et al which are well supported by experimental data. We provide theoretical explanation of the divergence of relative viscosity in terms of a topological-type transition which mathematically can be made isomorphic to the more familiar Bose-Einstein condensation transition. Because of this, the methods developed in this work are not limited to suspensions only. In concluding section we mention other applications of the developed formalism ranging from turbulence and magnetohydrodynamics to high temperature superconductors, QCD, string models, etc.
Similar papers
Superconductivity as a Bose-Einstein condensation?
similarity 0.87S. K. Adhikari et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0004223
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Functional renormalization for Bose-Einstein Condensation
similarity 0.87S. Floerchinger & C. Wetterich · 2008 · arXiv:0801.2910
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The London field in bulk layered superconductors
similarity 0.87G. Modanese · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9909441
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bose-glass to Superfluid transition in the three-dimensional Bose-Hubbard Model
similarity 0.87Peter Hitchcock & Erik S. Sorensen · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0601182
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Condensate of a charged boson fluid at non-integer dimensions
similarity 0.86Sang-Hoon Kim et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0204018
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weakly interacting Bose gas in the vicinity of the critical point
similarity 0.86Nikolay Prokof'ev et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401002
Source status unknown — claims are unverified