Consistency of ground state and spectroscopic measurements on flux qubits
A. Izmalkov, S. H. W. van der Ploeg, S. N. Shevchenko, M. Grajcar, E. Il'ichev, U. Hübner, A. N. Omelyanchouk, H. -G. Meyer
arXiv:0808.3901 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.017003 · 2008-08-28 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We compare the results of ground state and spectroscopic measurements carried out on superconducting flux qubits which are effective two-level quantum systems. For a single qubit and for two coupled qubits we show excellent agreement between the parameters of the pseudospin Hamiltonian found using both methods. We argue, that by making use of the ground state measurements the Hamiltonian of N coupled flux qubits can be reconstructed as well at temperatures smaller than the energy level separation. Such a reconstruction of a many-qubit Hamiltonian can be useful for future quantum information processing devices.
Similar papers
Dynamical decoupling and noise spectroscopy with a superconducting flux qubit
similarity 0.90Jonas Bylander et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1101.4707
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low-decoherence flux qubit
similarity 0.89J. Q. You et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0609225
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
QND measurement of a superconducting qubit in the weakly projective regime
similarity 0.88T. Picot et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1007.0166
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Qubits: A Short Review
similarity 0.88M. H. Devoret et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411174
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental Demonstration of a Robust and Scalable Flux Qubit
similarity 0.88R. Harris et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0909.4321
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topology-Enhanced Superconducting Qubit Networks for In-Sensor Quantum Information Processing
similarity 0.88J. Settino et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2507.13228
Source status unknown — claims are unverified