Some Properties of the Spin-Polarized Attractive Hubbard Model
Agnieszka Kujawa, Roman Micnas
arXiv:0809.1420 · DOI 10.12693/APHYSPOLA.115.138 · 2008-09-08 · arXiv: Strongly Correlated Electrons
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The influence of a Zeeman magnetic field on the superconducting characteristics of the attractive Hubbard model was investigated. The ground state and temperature phase diagrams were obtained for a fixed number of particles. Two critical magnetic fields were found for the first order phase transition from the superconducting to the normal state for $n\neq 1$. For some range of parameters a reentrant transition was found and gapless superconductivity was obtained. The significance of the Hartree term was also analyzed.
Similar papers
Stability of superfluid phases in the 2D Spin-Polarized Attractive Hubbard Model
similarity 0.93Agnieszka Kujawa-Cichy & Roman Micnas · 2013 · arXiv:1309.6668
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the Phase Diagram of Spin-Polarized Attractive Hubbard Model: Weak Coupling Limit
similarity 0.92Agnieszka Kujawa & Roman Micnas · 2008 · arXiv:0808.1578
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing Fluctuations in The Attractive Hubbard Model in the Atomic Limit
similarity 0.91S. Verga et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0408074
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov state for ultracold fermions in lattice and harmonic potentials: a review
similarity 0.91Jami J. Kinnunen et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1706.07076
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BCS and Attractive Hubbard Model Comparative Study
similarity 0.89Nathan Salwen et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0305367
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Some Global Properties of the Attractive Hubbard Model in the Superconducting Phase: T-Matrix Approximation in 2D
similarity 0.89S. Schafroth et al. · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9612246
Source status unknown — claims are unverified