Weak and strong measurement of a qubit using a switching-based detector
S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, Franco Nori
arXiv:0810.4386 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.032317 · 2008-10-24 · Physical Review A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze the operation of a switching-based detector that probes a qubit's observable that does not commute with the qubit's Hamiltonian, leading to a nontrivial interplay between the measurement and free-qubit dynamics. In order to obtain analytic results and develop intuitive understanding of the different possible regimes of operation, we use a theoretical model where the detector is a quantum two-level system that is constantly monitored by a macroscopic system. We analyze how to interpret the outcome of the measurement and how the state of the qubit evolves while it is being measured. We find that the answers to the above questions depend on the relation between the different parameters in the problem. In addition to the traditional strong-measurement regime, we identify a number of regimes associated with weak qubit-detector coupling. An incoherent detector whose switching time is measurable with high accuracy can provide high-fidelity information, but the measurement basis is determined only upon switching of the detector. An incoherent detector whose switching time can be known only with low accuracy provides a measurement in the qubit's energy eigenbasis with reduced measurement fidelity. A coherent detector measures the qubit in its energy eigenbasis and, under certain conditions, can provide high-fidelity information.
Similar papers
Quantum state detection of a superconducting flux qubit using a DC-SQUID in the inductive mode
similarity 0.91A. Lupascu et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0410730
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-Shot Readout of Macroscopic Quantum Superposition State in a Superconducting Flux Qubit
similarity 0.90Hirotaka Tanaka et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407299
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of flux qubit states with the help of a superconducting differential double contour interferometer
similarity 0.89Nikulov, A. V. · 2020 · arXiv:1909.09460
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson junctions, superconducting circuits, and qubit for quantum technologies
similarity 0.89Roberta Citro et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.20911
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A theoretical analysis of flux-qubit measurements with a dc-SQUID
similarity 0.88H. Nakano et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0406622
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum nondemolition-like fast measurement scheme for a superconducting qubit
similarity 0.88I. Serban et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified