Charge expulsion, Spin Meissner effect, and charge inhomogeneity in superconductors
J. E. Hirsch
arXiv:0810.5127 · DOI 10.1007/s10948-008-0381-5 · 2008-10-28 · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductivity occurs in systems that have a lot of negative charge: the highly negatively charged $(CuO2)^{--}$ planes in the cuprates, negatively charged $(FeAs)^-$ planes in the iron arsenides, and negatively charged $B^-$ planes in magnesium diboride. And, in the nearly filled (with negative electrons) bands of almost all superconductors, as evidenced by their positive Hall coefficient in the normal state. According to the theory of hole superconductivity, metals become superconducting because they are driven to expel negative charge (electrons) from their interior. This is why NIS tunneling spectra are asymmetric, with larger current for negatively biased samples. It is also why there is a Meissner effect: as electrons are expelled towards the surface in the presence of a magnetic field, the Lorentz force imparts them with azimuthal velocity, thus generating the surface Meissner current that screens the interior magnetic field. In type II superconductors, the Lorentz force acting on expelled electrons that don't reach the surface gives rise to the azimuthal velocity of the vortex currents. In the absence of applied magnetic field, expelled electrons still acquire azimuthal velocity, due to the spin-orbit interaction, in opposite direction for spin-up and spin-down electrons: the "Spin Meissner effect". This results in a macroscopic spin current flowing near the surface of superconductors in the absence of applied fields. In strongly type II superconductors this physics should give rise to charge inhomogeneity and spin currents throughout the interior of the superconductor, to large sensitivity to (non-magnetic) disorder and to a strong tendency to phase separation.
Similar papers
Magnetic flux expulsion in a superconducting wire
similarity 0.92J. E. Hirsch · 2021 · arXiv:2106.00262
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Explanation of the Meissner Effect and Prediction of a Spin Meissner Effect in Low and High Superconductors
similarity 0.91J. E. Hirsch · 2009 · arXiv:0908.1577
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Defying inertia: how rotating superconductors generate magnetic fields
similarity 0.91J. E. Hirsch · 2018 · arXiv:1812.06780
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Bohr superconductor
similarity 0.90J. E. Hirsch · 2015 · arXiv:1512.05014
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The origin of the Meissner effect in new and old superconductors
similarity 0.90J. E. Hirsch · 2011 · arXiv:1201.0139
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental consequences of predicted charge rigidity of superconductors
similarity 0.90J. E. Hirsch · 2012 · arXiv:1201.3637
Source status unknown — claims are unverified