Decoherence in rf SQUID Qubits
Douglas A. Bennett, Luigi Longobardi, Vijay Patel, Wei Chen, Dmitri V. Averin, James E. Lukens
arXiv:0811.2268 · DOI 10.1007/s11128-009-0099-8 · 2008-11-14
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report measurements of coherence times of an rf SQUID qubit using pulsed microwaves and rapid flux pulses. The modified rf SQUID, described by an double-well potential, has independent, in situ, controls for the tilt and barrier height of the potential. The decay of coherent oscillations is dominated by the lifetime of the excited state and low frequency flux noise and is consistent with independent measurement of these quantities obtained by microwave spectroscopy, resonant tunneling between fluxoid wells and decay of the excited state. The oscillation's waveform is compared to analytical results obtained for finite decay rates and detuning and averaged over low frequency flux noise.
Similar papers
Observation of Cascaded Two-Photon-Induced Transitions between Fluxoid States of a SQUID
similarity 0.92Siyuan Han et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable Flux Qubit manipulated by fast pulses: operating requirements, dissipation and decoherence
similarity 0.91Fabio Chiarello · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0602464
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of Strong Capacitive Coupling Between Meta-Atoms in rf SQUID Metamaterials
similarity 0.88Jingnan Cai et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.07044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weakly Flux-Tunable Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.88José M. Chávez-Garcia et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.04164
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impurity-induced dephasing of Andreev states
similarity 0.87N. I. Lundin & Y. M. Galperin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent oscillations between classically separable quantum states of a superconducting loop
similarity 0.87Vladimir E. Manucharyan et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0910.3039
Source status unknown — claims are unverified