A predictive bond order model connects covalent superconductivity, including cuprates, oxypnictides or HfN based materials
H. Oesterreicher
arXiv:0811.2792 · 2008-11-18
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A phenomenological bond order model predicting doping curves [Tc vs doped charge, c] of cuprates is found to have wider applicability. In this model Tc is dependent on the density of electronic pair crystals [EC] in a covalently bonding layer structure and on a layer Isolation factor, f [ECI model]. Characteristic doping curve events such as optima are correlated with a select number of EC with pair repeats corresponding to multiples of lattice parameters such as c=2/3x4=0.167, where 3x4 represent pair periodicity of 3a0 and 4b0. At these EC all doped charge is converted into pairs according to c=2np. For Tc prediction one writes Tc=2npfTe, where Te=600K and 300K as empirical constants for hole and electron doping. Doping curves for YBa2Cu3Oy with their sharp optima or kinks, separated by near linear ranges, or Tc plateaus on different preparations, can express the stability of special EC. Examples are c=0.22=2/32 for the sharp optimum or the Tc=90K plateau, and c= 0.17 for the 60K plateau, the latter depicting also the optimum for other systems such as La2-wSrwCuO4. For oxypnictides R[O1-xFx]FeAs one writes Tc=300x and expects EC with optimal dopings at x=0.11 and 0.17, as corroborated experimentally. Other examples include HfN derivatives such as Li0.17HfNCl.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 60 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-wSrwCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 60 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| R[O1-xFx]FeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 33 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| R[O1-xFx]FeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 51 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
How pressure enhances the critical temperature of superconductivity in YBaCuO
similarity 0.88Michael Jurkutat et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.10157
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal properties of cuprate superconductors: Evidence and Implications
similarity 0.86T. Schneider · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0204236
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of superconductivity in high- cuprates due to nonmagnetic impurities: Implications for the order parameter symmetry
similarity 0.86M. Bayindir & Z. Gedik · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9810202
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Boson-Fermion Duality and Metastability in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.86Ranninger, J. & Domanski, T. · 2010 · arXiv:1001.3645
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two dimensional nature of superconductivity in intercalated layered systems LiHfNCl and LiZrNCl: muon spin relaxation and magnetization measurements
similarity 0.86T. Ito et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0310736
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of magnetic mechanism for cuprate superconductivity
similarity 0.86Amit Keren · 2009 · arXiv:0909.1040
Source status unknown — claims are unverified