Continuum versus discrete flux behaviour in large mesoscopic Bi(2)Sr(2)CaCu(2)O(8+delta) disks
M. R. Connolly, M. V. Milosevic, S. J. Bending, J. R. Clem, T. Tamegai
arXiv:0811.3720 · DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/85/17008 · 2008-11-23 · EPL (Europhysics Letters)
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Scanning Hall probe and local Hall magnetometry measurements have been used to investigate flux distributions in large mesoscopic superconducting disks with sizes that lie near the crossover between the bulk and mesoscopic vortex regimes. Results obtained by directly mapping the magnetic induction profiles of the disks at different applied fields can be quite successfully fitted to analytic models which assume a continuous distribution of flux in the sample. At low fields, however, we do observe clear signatures of the underlying discrete vortex structure and can resolve the characteristic mesoscopic compression of vortex clusters in increasing magnetic fields. Even at higher fields, where single vortex resolution is lost, we are still able to track configurational changes in the vortex patterns, since competing vortex orders impose unmistakable signatures on "local" magnetisation curves as a function of the applied field. Our observations are in excellent agreement with molecular dynamics numerical simulations which lead us to a natural definition of the lengthscale for the crossover between discrete and continuum behaviours in our system.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 91 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
From vortex molecules to the Abrikosov lattice in thin mesoscopic superconducting disks
similarity 0.89L. R. E. Cabral et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetization of mesoscopic superconducting discs
similarity 0.88P. Singha Deo et al. · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9707018
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Confinement of Vortices in Nano-Superconducting Devices
similarity 0.87Wai Man Wu et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1707.01842
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical current in thin flat superconductors with Bean-Livingston and geometrical barriers
similarity 0.87G. P. Mikitik · 2021 · arXiv:2104.13329
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Study of the threshold line between macroscopic and bulk behaviors for homogeneous type II superconductors
similarity 0.87A. Presotto et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1310.3247
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Soft vortex matter in a type-I/type-II superconducting bilayer
similarity 0.87L. Komendová et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.5555
Source status unknown — claims are unverified