Nature of the Nodal Kink in Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectra of Cuprate Superconductors
H. S. Ruiz, A. Badía
arXiv:0811.3863 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.054528 · 2008-11-24 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The experimental finding of an ubiquitous kink in the nodal direction of angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopies of superconducting cuprates has been reproduced theoretically. Our model is built upon the Migdal-Eliashberg theory for the electron self-energy within the phonon-coupling scenario. Following this perturbative approach, a numerical evaluation of the bare band dispersion energy in terms of the electron-phonon coupling parameter $λ$ allows a unified description of the nodal-kink effect. Our study reveals that distinction between $λ$ and the technically defined mass-enhancement parameter $λ^{*}$ is relevant for the quantitative description of data, as well as for a meaningful interpretation of previous studies. A remarkable agreement between theory and experiment has been achieved for different samples and at different doping levels. The full energy spectrum is covered in the case of LSCO, Bi2212 and overdoped Y123. In the case of underdoped Y123, the model applies to the low energy region (close to Fermi level).
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+0.12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 64.81 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+0.16 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 42.45 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+0.21 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 19.93 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 85 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 81.66 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 93 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 82.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+0.16 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| YBa2Cu3O6+0.4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17.51 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+0.6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.82 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+0.85 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.39 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 91 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 84.19 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 36.43 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
similarity 0.90Hongyun Zhang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.06942
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Kink in cuprates: the role of the low-energy density of states
similarity 0.89E. Razzoli et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.05378
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron Phonon Interaction and Strong Correlations in High-Temperature Superconductors: One can not avoid unavoidable
similarity 0.89Miodrag L. Kulic · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404287
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The High Temperature Superconductivity in Cuprates: Physics of the Pseudogap Region
similarity 0.89Paolo Cea · 2016 · arXiv:1604.05059
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unmasking the Origin of Kinks in the Photoemission Spectra of Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.88Zhenglu Li et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.09518
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
New Developments in Laser-Based Photoemission Spectroscopy and its Scientific Applications: a Key Issues Review
similarity 0.88Xingjiang Zhou et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.04473
Source status unknown — claims are unverified