Cluster Dynamical Mean-Field Methods for d-wave Superconductors: the Role of Geometry
A. Isidori, M. Capone
arXiv:0812.4526 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115138 · 2008-12-24 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We compare the accuracy of two cluster extensions of Dynamical Mean-Field Theory in describing d-wave superconductors, using as a reference model a saddle-point t-J model which can be solved exactly in the thermodynamic limit and at the same time reasonably describes the properties of high-temperature superconductors. The two methods are Cellular Dynamical Mean-Field Theory, which is based on a real-space perspective, and Dynamical Cluster Approximation, which enforces a momentum-space picture by imposing periodic boundary conditions on the cluster, as opposed to the open boundary conditions of the first method. We consider the scaling of the methods for large cluster size, but we also focus on the behavior for small clusters, such as those accessible by means of present techniques, with particular emphasis on the geometrical structure, which is definitely a relevant issue in small clusters.
Similar papers
Cluster dynamical mean-field methods for d-wave superconductors: Role of geometry
similarity 0.92A. Isidori & M. Capone
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The magnetic susceptibility of the t-J model at low hole doping
similarity 0.89D. B. Bailey et al. · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9612231
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudo-Landau levels of Bogoliubov quasiparticles in strained nodal superconductors
similarity 0.89Geremia Massarelli et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1707.07683
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model with cellular dynamical mean-field theory: a quantum impurity model analysis
similarity 0.89C. Walsh et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.02681
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The symplectic-N t-J model and s superconductors
similarity 0.89Rebecca Flint & Piers Coleman · 2012 · arXiv:1204.2302
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supersymmetric Mean-Field Theory of t-J Model
similarity 0.89Chi-Ho Cheng & T. K. Ng · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9908161
Source status unknown — claims are unverified